Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Law report: CASE SUMMARIES: 18 may 1998

Sunday 17 May 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The following notes of judgments were prepared by the reporters of the All England Law Reports.

Criminal appeal

R v Jackson; CA (Crim Div) (Rose LJ, Butterfield, Richards JJ) 28 April 1998.

Where a single judge considering an application for leave to appeal against conviction or sentence to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division granted leave on some grounds but specifically refused it on others, the grounds on which leave had been refused might only be pursued with the leave of the Full Court.

Marc Willers (Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the appellant; Hugh Davies (CPS) for the Crown.

VAT

Eastbourne Town Radio Cars Ltd v Commrs of Customs & Excise; CA (Simon Brown, Swinton Thomas, Potter LJJ) 7 May 1998.

A constitution adopted by an association formed by taxi drivers to provide administrative facilities to its members specified that the association acted as agent for the individual members. The reality, however, was that "facilities or advantages" were provided to the members by the association within s 94(2) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994. Skilful drafting did not alter the position that the association was liable for VAT.

Joe Smouha (Brachers, Maidstone) for the association; Melanie Hall, Phillipa Whipple (Solicitor, C & E) for the Crown.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in