Number changes ring up the bill for millions of mobile phone users
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's seven million mobile phone users will have to change their phone numbers within the next four years, under a scheme proposed by the telecoms regulator Oftel.
The proposal will cause disruption and extra expense for long-standing users, who will have to change stationery and inform contacts. Oftel claims that the move is justified because industry figures show that "on average" users only keep a mobile phone for two and a half years.
The four main networks have been quick to point out that the figure is misleading because many people have actually kept the same mobile phone for up to 12 years, and that the low average is caused by corporate clients who sign up for a few months to take advantage of cheap deals but then move on to other networks when those expire.
Phone operators also say that the move will delay the introduction of "number portability" - by which somebody could retain the same phone number even though they change between networks. Portability would reduce the cost of changing between networks, because it cuts down on reprinting of stationery, for example.
The proposal has been largely overlooked since its publication earlier this year, because it came at the same time as suggestions for new numbering systems for cities across the country. It would mean that all mobile phone numbers would start with the prefix 07, which would also be used for pagers. Vodafone will begin allocating the first such numbers later this summer, after receiving an allocation from Oftel earlier this month.
Presently, mobile phone numbers can begin with a number of prefixes, including 09, 08, 04 and 03. In 1995, following the "Phoneday" in which all fixed numbers were changed to start with 01, Oftel declared that 04- numbers would in future denote mobile phones. But then it reversed its decision.
The regulator said yesterday that the reason for introducing the 07 prefix was that people wanted to know when they were calling a mobile phone, as the existing variety meant it was not always obvious from the number.
But one network operator pointed out yesterday that this solution will not be perfect because besides mobile phones the 07 prefix will include "personal" numbers, which are guaranteed to reach any number, fixed or mobile, and pagers. All could have different pricing regimes. "We're not as convinced as Oftel that grouping all the numbers under the 07 prefix will help people know what the charge for phoning will be," said one industry source.
Charges for calling mobile phones can vary enormously.
The technical cost of changing mobile phone numbers will almost all be borne by the networks, rather than the customers. "The market in the UK is too competitive for us to do anything else," said a spokesman for Vodafone.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments