Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nolan attacks secrecy

Chris Blackhurst
Thursday 14 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHRIS BLACKHURST

Westminster Correspondent

Whitehall is too secret and MPs do not have enough powers to keep a proper check on ministers, Lord Nolan, the senior judge appointed by the Prime Minister to review standards in public life, said yesterday.

In a nod towards growing pressure for an United States-style Freedom of Information Act - a demand that has intensified with the Scott arms- to-Iraq report - Lord Nolan said the US system allowed politicians to keep closer tabs on the government. "It is very difficult for the House of Commons to exercise the degree of supervision over the executive which can be achieved for example in the United States legislature," he said.

He used a speech to the Chartered Association of Certified Accountants at the Guildhall in London to hint that MPs' salaries should be raised, he said a review of MPs' pay and expenses was "too long overdue".

Lord Nolan sought to clarify a "misunderstanding" over his first report into standards in public life. He stressed that his report had not suggested MPs should have no paid outside interests, merely that there should be a ban on them being employed by firms which took part in parliamentary lobbying as a business activity.

His second report - into quangos and local spending bodies - is due out in May.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in