Nike treads into environment row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The leading sports wear manufacturer Nike has been forced to redesign its Air trainers after discovering they are a threat to the environment.
The shoes, as worn by stars such as Andre Agassi (above), use a gas which fills the cushioned heels and soles, giving them buoyancy. The gas is far more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.
Embarrassed Nike executives, who pride themselves on being environmentally responsible, have promised to phase out the use of the substance sulphur hexafluoride, or SF6, within three years. Two-thirds of the shoes sold by Nike use the gas. The range, led by Air Max, went on sale in 1978.
The company uses 288 tonnes of SF6 a year, a gas which stays in the atmosphere for 3,200 years, 30 years longer than carbon dioxide.
The switch from SF6 to nitrogen has been welcomed by environmentalists. Tarjei Haaland, a spokesman for Greenpeace, said: "It's a strong and very persistent gas and making shoes is a stupid use for it. It's excellent that they are phasing it out but why not 100 per cent by next year?"
Graham Anderson, a Nike spokesman, said that while world leaders had given themselves 15 years to cut in greenhouse gases, Nike had decided on a total phase out by 2001.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments