Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

New Wembley plans kicked into touch

Nick Harris
Wednesday 01 December 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PLANS FOR a new stadium at Wembley were disrupted last night when the Secretary of State for Culture, Chris Smith, told the House of Commons that an independent report into the proposed pounds 475m edifice raised doubts about its suitability for international athletics events.

Mr Smith told the designers to go back to the drawing board. There will be a "thorough analysis of the process of decision-making by all parties up to this point". Not only will the development be delayed, it is doubtful whether Wembley will ever truly be a national stadium, rather than Britain's biggest football ground. The stadium has consistently been promoted by its owner, Wembley National Stadium Ltd (WNSL), as a potential site for the Olympic Games and has received pounds 120m in Lottery funding on that basis. WNSL stressed that the arena could be converted from a 90,000-seat football ground into an 80,000-seat Olympic stadium.

The report, by the US-based experts Ellerbe Becket, concludes: "This stadium ... cannot readily provide the central venue for an Olympic Games."

David Conn, Sport, page 30

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in