Nazi Trial: The late show
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In deference to the advanced age of the accused, and many of the witnesses, the trial of Maurice Papon will sit in the afternoons only. It is expected to last for at least three months, with a cut-off date of 23 December.
Character witnesses for Papon, depending on the time available, may include the former President Valery Giscard d'Estaing and former Prime Minister, Raymond Barre.
A large section of the trial will be given over to establishing the political and moral climate of Vichy France. Evidence will be given by the most eminent historians of the period: the American Robert Paxton, the French writers Henry Rousso and Henri Amouroux and the Nobel peace prize-winner Elie Wiesel. Over 50,000 documents have been assembled.
There may also be many days of abstruse legal argument. Although the basic facts are not in dispute, the legal basis for trying Papon for "complicity in crimes against humanity" is far from clear. Arguments on this point disrupted the trials of the German torturer Klaus Barbie in the 1980s and the Vichy militia chief, Paul Touvier, in the 1970s. The prosecution must prove that Papon had "personal complicity" in genocide, not simply that he acted within a Vichy state apparatus in which the important decisions were outside his competence.
Prosecutors will seek to prove that Papon showed unnecessary zeal in his rounding up of Jews; the defence will bring evidence that he did intervene to help some escape the net. It appears, however, that these interventions began only in late 1943 or early 1944 when Papon was in touch with the resistance and preparing the alibi which allowed him to survive the liberation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments