Mystery of mutant toadflax solved at last
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A BOTANICAL mystery that nearly inspired a theory of evolution more than a century before Charles Darwin came up with the idea has been solved by biologists.
The toadflax plant, Linaria vulgaris, normally produces asymmetrical flowers, but occasionally a mutant form grows symmetrical flowers, with identical upper and lower petals. When the great 18th-century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus discovered the mutant flower in 1742, he thought it must be a new species, even though the rest of the plant was identical to typical toadflax.
Linnaeus called the flower Peloria, Greek for "monster", not because it was ugly but because it had monstrous implications for the belief in the immutability of species.
"This is certainly no less remarkable than if a cow were to give birth to a calf with a wolf's head," he wrote.
Enrico Coen and his student Pilar Cubas, of the John Innes Centre in Norwich, have found the genetic explanation.
The Lcyc gene changes as a result of having extra organic substances called methyl groups added to its chemical structure, according to research published in the journal Nature. It results in structural changes in the way the flower develops.
Linnaeus, the founding father of the binomial system of biological classification, concluded that the mutant flower must have resulted from some sort of transformation of the common toadflax into a new species.
Professor Coen said: "This is the first time that a natural modification of this kind has been found to be inherited, suggesting that this kind of change may be more important for natural genetic variation and evolution than has previously been suspected."
"It provides a molecular understanding of what people have been doing for a long time about flowers, by taking them from nature and propagating them in their garden.
"It shows that many of the flowers grown in gardens result from specific changes to the genes in the wild," he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments