MPs reject plan to end abuse of Scots and Welsh
DEVOLUTION
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference."JOCK", "TAFFY" and "Sassenach" are all likely to continue as terms of Parliamentary abuse after MPs yesterday rejected plans to ban offensive remarks about their counterparts in the rest of the UK.
The Commons Procedure Committee attacked as unworkable Government moves to bar English MPs from criticising their colleagues in the Sottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly. In its report on procedures in Parliament in the wake of devolution, the committee concluded that members of the Scots and Welsh assemblies should have no greater protection from abuse than other members of the public.
Margaret Beckett, the Leader of the House of Commons, had suggested that new rules should be introduced to bar "offensive expressions" about the two new chambers.She proposed a plan that would allow MPs to criticise Scots and Welsh representatives only in the form of substantive motions. Similar conventions currently apply to the House of Lords, the judiciary and the Royal Family but MPs decided against a ban because it was "unlikely" that Scots and Welsh politicians would refrain from criticising Westminster.
Nicholas Winterton, MP for Macclesfield and the chairman of the committee, said in the report that members were concerned that the Government proposal would curtail the Commons' much-cherished tradition of freedom of speech.
"We are reluctant to restrict the freedom of speech of Parliament by giving members of the devolved legislatures greater protection than that available to members of the public or other politicians," the committee's report stated. Although MPs should still refrain from personal attacks, they should not be prevented from criticising the Scottish Parliament or Welsh Assembly.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments