Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mother loses damages award

Tuesday 04 November 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A mother who suffered serious health problems after the "horrendous" delivery of her first child yesterday lost her pounds 64,000 damages award. Samantha Knight's daughter weighed in at a healthy 11lb 2oz when she was born with the help of forceps at Maidstone Hospital in July 1987.

The consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, who delivered the child, later described it as "one of the most horrendous" he had had to carry out during his career.Mrs Knight, now 34, later needed repeated treatment under general anaesthetic to repair damage caused by the birth, but her gynaecological problems had persisted and triggered depression.

She had a second child by Caesarean section in November 1990 and underwent a hysterectomy in April 1991. In March last year, a High Court judge awarded Mrs Knight, of Appledore, Kent, pounds 64,059 damages after ruling that West Kent Health Authority was liable for her injuries.

Yesterday, Lord Justice Kennedy, sitting with Lord Justice Morritt and Lord Justice Chadwick in the Court of Appeal, allowed the authority's appeal against the decision. They ruled that she was entitled to less than pounds 1,000 damages for the authority's admitted negligence in failing to intervene at a time which would have saved her from another two and a half hours of labour.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in