Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Microsoft outwitted by judge

Charles Arthur
Wednesday 31 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Who understands how Microsoft's software works? Is it a federal judge, a PC magazine, or the Seattle-based corporation?

It only took Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson 90 seconds to decide that Microsoft might not know its own products very well. That's how long it took him on Tuesday to "uninstall" a program that Microsoft had insisted last month was inextricably intertwined with its Windows95 operating system.

Last month, Microsoft lost a court battle in which the US Department of Justice accused it of breaking a 1995 agreement to keep separate the sale of its Windows95 operating system and its Internet Explorer (IE) browser, used to surf the World Wide Web.

The purpose was to prevent Microsoft using its near-monopoly of the PC operating system to rub out rivals for the Internet browser market.

But after the 11 December verdict, Microsoft said that it was simply not possible to split the modern versions of IE and Windows95, and offered PC manufacturers a Hobson's choice: either take Windows95 with IE integrated into it, or take a two-year-old version of the operating system without.

However Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who made the original ruling, found that he could uninstall IE in 90 seconds, leaving the latest version of Windows95 operating normally.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in