Members' Interests: Maude failed to declare interests on motion form
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE SHADOW Chancellor, Francis Maude, was criticised yesterday for failing to declare two directorships during Commons procedures.
The Standards and Privileges Committee found that although Mr Maude had listed his interests in the official register, he should have mentioned them again when he signed a motion or amendment.
Complaints against Mr Maude concerned his directorships of the supermarket chain Asda and of Gartmore Shared Equity Trust (GSET).
The shadow chancellor failed to put the required "R" by his name to denote a registered interest when signing a motion on PEPs and ISAs and when promoting a new Finance Bill clause on the retail trade.
Mr Maude accepted he should have declared his Asda directorship but said his name had been routinely attached to the clause as a member of the Conservative front bench.
He also argued that GSET did not trade in PEPs or ISAs, but the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Elizabeth Filkin, found that a closely related firm, Gartmore Investment, did do so.
She accepted that Mr Maude's transgression had been unintentional, but added it was members' responsibility to ensure they complied with the rules. The Standards and Privileges Committee decided no further action should be taken against Mr Maude.
The complaints were brought by two Labour MPs, Christopher Leslie and Geraint Davies. Last night Mr Leslie said that ignorance was no defence. "The question is, how many other things go on without his knowledge? I personally think he should come and apologise," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments