MEDICINE: Screening for diseases can damage your health
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Screening for diseases could seriously damage your health, according to the British Medical Journal. Those who receive positive results may suffer needlessly high levels of anxiety, while those who screen negatively erroneously believe they can maintain their unhealthy lifestyles, it warned.
People found in workplace screening programmes to have high blood pressure took more time off sick, had increased anxiety and and saw themselves as less healthy, regardless of whether their hypertension warranted treatment.
In cholesterol screening, several studies have shown a reduction in deaths from heart diseases but a small increase in total mortality. This, it is suggested, is because men who know they are more at risk from heart disease may take other risks as well.
The authors warn that those who receive negative results may also ignore future consequences of their behaviour: "For example, those who screen negative for cancer may feel safe continuing smoking." Glenda Cooper
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments