Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Medical editor sacked over study of oral sex

Andrew Marshall
Friday 15 January 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE DEFINITION of sex is at the heart of the trial of Bill Clinton. But an effort to investigate the subject led to the sacking of the editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association, one of the leading academic journals in the profession.

Dr George Lundberg, who had edited the prestigious publication for 17 years, was called at home yesterday and dismissed.

The Associated Press reported the reason was an article he had published on college students' sexual attitudes in the forthcoming edition of the journal, which was apparently released to coincide with the trial.

President Clinton argued that he had not had sex with Monica Lewinsky because only oral sex had taken place. A study of 599 college students in 1991 found that 59 per cent of them agreed, as it turned out.

"I'm absolutely shocked,'' said June M Reinisch, author of the article and the retired director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction. "There was nothing unusual about this paper." She said that the case centred on academic freedom, though the association seemed to believe that Mr Lundberg had been playing politics.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in