£17,500 fine over 'spiritual healer' advert
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The TV watchdog imposed a £17,500 fine today for "spiritual healer" advertising which was found to be capable of exploiting vulnerable people.
Ofcom disciplined licensee DM Digital Television Ltd in respect of its DM Digital service.
In February 2009 the Manchester-based digital station, which broadcasts mainly in Urdu to the UK Asian community, aired an ad for a "spiritual healer" called Professor Mohammed Zain.
Advertising regulator the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received a complaint from Manchester Trading Standards, which had been contacted by the social worker of a viewer who had approached Prof Zain after seeing the advert.
The viewer said she twice paid money to Prof Zain for help in finding a partner.
According to the viewer, Prof Zain told her to credit his account with £110 and to pray for one week and then to call him back.
When she did this, he told her to credit his bank account with a further £1,400 and in return he would find her "a prince" and the viewer transferred the requested cash.
The ASA found the advert breached the CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising Standards Code.
It concluded that the advert was "likely to exploit the hopes and fears of vulnerable viewers".
The ASA can refer serious cases to Ofcom as the backstop regulator, which has powers to fine broadcasters for breaching advertising rules.
Ofcom considered the breach was serious because it resulted in actual financial harm to the viewer.
Ofcom also concluded that the breach showed a repeated failure by DM Digital to ensure that material met the requirements of the TV Advertising Code.
The watchdog's broadcasting sanctions committee said it was concerned "that this particular type of unacceptable advertising, that represented advice to individuals based on faith based practices for personal problems, was likely to exploit vulnerable viewers".
In October 2008, DM Digital was disciplined by the committee for a show called Health Is Wealth, which contained claims about being able to treat medical conditions like cancer, diabetes and hepatitis.
A £15,000 fine was imposed in this case for breaching Ofcom's Broadcasting Code and raising "serious concerns" about viewer harm.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments