Porn should get its own code of conduct to protect people, says BBC documentary
- Can Porn Be Ethical? on BBC Radio 4 suggests porn could be policed by a 'kitemark'
- Calls for ministers to legislate for an 'ethical code of conduct'
- Code would ensure that participants are happy with the activities they’re taking part in
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers should legislate to create an “ethical code of conduct” for pornography to protect participants and viewers of sexually explicit content, a controversial BBC Radio 4 documentary will suggest.
In Can Porn Be Ethical?, broadcast tonight, Nichi Hodgson, a former dominatrix who writes about the sex industry, suggests that the watching and making of pornography could be policed by a “kitemark” which would safeguard standards and best practices.
The code, which could be backed up by legislation, would cover pay and hours for porn actors, making sure participants are happy with the activities they’re taking part in, the setting of strict consensual boundaries, the verification of ages, health checks and rules on how the images will be distributed.
“It would be good for society to at least explore an ethical code of conduct for pornography,” said Hodgson, who talks to actors about the kinds of practices that bother them, and visits a so-called “feminist porn” shoot in Brighton for the documentary.
The Radio 4 programme, which may shock listeners who stay tuned after The Archers, contains a discussion over whether female ejaculation should have been among the acts which can no longer be depicted by British pornographers.
A change in the law last year requires that video-on-demand online porn must now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD releases by the British Board of Film Censors, a prohibition ruling out “spanking” and “aggressive whipping.”
However Julie Bindel, the founder of Justice for Women, tells the programme that an “ethical code” for porn would not alter the industry’s underlying power relationship which relied upon “commercialising orifices.”
Mark Stephens, the media lawyer, said that legislation to enshrine a code would have no impact on porn producers operating beyond the reach of the law. A “whistleblowing” option for exploited women would only work if the most vulnerable had confidence that the authorities would not hold any past offences, such as prostitution, against them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments