The Guardian to cut 250 jobs within three years 'in bid to break even'
The publisher lost £58.6 million in the last financial year
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Guardian newspaper is planning to cut 250 jobs, including 100 from editorial, as it seeks to balance its books by 2019.
In an attempt to staunch heavy losses, which amounted to £58.6 million in the year to the end of March, the publisher will seek to “restructure the less profitable parts of the company in a bed to break even within three years”.
While the 210 people employed outside the UK are not expected to be affected, the UK workforce will be cut by 18 per cent, including positions that remain unfilled – equivalent to 310 jobs.
In total some 100 jobs are earmarked to be cut from the 725-strong editorial workforce and 150 from commercial departments, support functions such as finance and human resources and other parts of the business.
The decision on whether the publisher will make compulsory redundancies will follow an eight-week consultation period.
In a joint email to staff, editor-in-chief Katharine Viner and chief executive David Pemsel said the “volatile media environment” had led to an “urgent need for radical action”.
“Our plan of action has one goal: to secure the journalistic integrity and financial independence of the Guardian in perpetuity,” they wrote, before adding they hoped the cuts would all be voluntary and that compulsory redundancies would only be considered only “if necessary”.
Michelle Stanistreet, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists, said: "This is a major blow for the staff of the Guardian and Observer and for journalism as a whole. We will oppose any compulsory redundancies.”
Brian Williams, Guardian father of the chapel for the National Union of Journalists, said: “We are encouraged by the fact the company is seeking voluntary redundancies and is looking to mitigate potential job losses by finding other cost-cutting measures.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments