TALK OF THE TRADE : Fiddly complaint
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The story behind the month-long speculation about whether Sir Bernard Ingham will become the most controversial member yet of the beleagured Press Complaints Commission is as follows. The PCC's appointments committee has first to be brought up to strength - five members - before it can appoint the seven new people needed by the PCC proper. The appointments committee currently has only three members, Lord Wakeham, chairman of the PCC, Harry Roche, chairman of Pressbof (which finances the PCC), and Lord Irvine, the Labour peer. In April 1993, in accordance with the Calcutt report, the PCC changed its articles of association to ensure five members gave a degree of independence to selections. But the PCC did not implement the changes (which also means members appointed since that date are technically invalid).
The good news is that two eminent people are being sounded out about joining the appointments committee. Once in place, they can collectively decide whether to extend an invitation to Sir Bernard, though the odds against him must be lengthening. Meanwhile, all this fiddling about, however constitutionally vital, is serving only to paralyse the PCC.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments