The Sun argues Queen 'statistically likely' to back Brexit amid calls for inquiry into contested report
Buckingham Palace has launched an official complaint and Nick Clegg called the story 'nonsense'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Sun has claimed the Queen is “statistically more likely” to back a Brexit because of her age and education level while defending its controversial report.
A front page story claiming the monarch had voiced strong Eurosceptic views during a lunch at Windsor Castle in 2011 has sparked calls for an investigation and a formal complaint to a media watchdog.
It claimed that two “impeccably placed” sources recounted how she had vented her anger with Brussels at Nick Clegg, who is pro-EU, his time as Deputy Prime Minister.
Buckingham Palace lodged a formal complaint with the Independent Press Standards Organisation on Wednesday and Mr Clegg called the article “nonsense” but the Sun has stood by its report.
Tony Gallagher, the paper's editor, said he had no doubt it was accurate and claimed journalists knew “much more” than was published.
“Multiple sources - two sources to be precise - came to us with information about the Queen and her views on the EU and we would have been derelict in our duty if we didn't put them in the paper. It's as simple as that,” he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
“You are going to have to take my word for it that we are completely confident that the Queen's views were expressed exactly as we have outlined them both in the headline and the story.”
In its coverage today, the newspaper accused Mr Clegg of attempting to “gag” Brexit campaigners and accused pro-EU figures of attempting to discredit the report because of the effect it could have on undecided voters ahead of the June referendum.
A report claimed that YouGov polls showed that “statistically the Queen is in a group highly likely to back Brexit”, adding: “Women aged over 60 without a university education back leaving the EU by 73 per cent.”
The Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, is facing calls to investigate who leaked the information - with Michael Gove seen as the prime suspect.
The Justice Secretary - who is an ardent Leave supporter - was one of four ministers, including Mr Clegg, to attend the only lunchtime meeting of the Privy Council to be held at the castle during 2011.
The then Welsh secretary Cheryl Gillan, who also backs Brexit, was also present. Neither has commented on the report.
Wes Streeting, the Labour MP for Ilford North, wrote to Sir Jeremy urging him to investigate the leak, saying it would be an ”extremely serious breach“ of Privy Council rules if it came from their meeting.
"If it is found that none of those who were present at the meeting in questions are implicated, I urge you to establish which “impeccably placed” individuals were involved in making such allegations to a national newspaper,” he wrote.
Leader of the Commons Chris Grayling, who supports a Brexit, confirmed that conversations with the Queen should always be treated as private but rejected calls for an inquiry.
"We have no idea where this story came from, whether the story is accurate - I have no ability to judge one way or the other,” he said.
"All I know is that it is going to be investigated by the press complaints body and that seems to me the right organisation to look at it.“
Buckingham Palace said its complaint was based on clause one of the Editors' Code of Practice, which governs accuracy.
If Ipso finds against the newspaper, it will have to publish a suitably prominent correction, possibly on its front page, and face a possible fine.
A previous statement on behalf of the Queen said she was “politically neutral” and had remained so throughout her reign, dismissing the “spurious, anonymously sourced claims”.
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments