The Daily Telegraph breached Editors' Code with 'misleading' Jeremy Corbyn 'anti-semite' front page
IPSO upholds complaint made by shadow Northern Ireland Secretary over article published during leadership contest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The press standards watchdog has upheld a complaint against the Daily Telegraph after it claimed on its front page that senior Labour figures viewed new leader Jeremy Corbyn as an “anti-Semite”.
Ivan Lewis, the shadow Northern Ireland Secretary, complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) over an article headlined “Labour grandees round on ‘anti-Semite’ Corbyn” published in August during the party’s leadership contest.
The newspaper was found to have misinterpreted remarks made by Mr Lewis in a separate article in which the MP criticised Mr Corbyn’s failure to challenge anti-Semites. Mr Lewis complained to the watchdog that he had never accused Mr Corbyn himself of anti-Semitism, as the Telegraph suggested.
IPSO, which found that the story was “significantly misleading” and breached the Editors’ Code on accuracy, has instructed the paper to publish a correction on page two and make reference to it on its front page.
In its ruling it said: “An express claim that Mr Corbyn was an anti-Semite would have constituted an exceptionally strong attack by the complainant on Mr Corbyn, with potential implications for both men; this was a highly significant claim. In fact, the complainant had not made this criticism in terms, as the article stated.”
Mr Lewis said he was “pleased” by the IPSO finding. The Telegraph had previously offered to publish a clarification on page 2 and beneath the online version of the article.
In the article, it had quoted from a piece by Mr Lewis in which the MP had said Mr Corbyn had “shown poor judgment in expressing support for and failing to speak out against people who have engaged in…anti-Semitic rhetoric. It saddens me to have to say to some on the left of British politics that anti-racism means zero tolerance of anti-Semitism, no ifs, and no buts”.
The Independent is not a signatory to IPSO, which was established by sections of the press industry after the Leveson inquiry into phone-hacking.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments