'Telegraph' wins Petra Ecclestone libel case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The High Court in London yesterday threw out a libel action brought by Formula One chief Bernie Ecclestone's daughter.
Petra Ecclestone had complained about an item in The Daily Telegraph's Mandrake diary column in June about the launch of her leather fashion collection, and her alleged reaction to Sir Paul McCartney's call for meat-free Mondays.
It quoted the 21-year-old as saying: "I am not a veggie and I don't have much time for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox." Ms Ecclestone disputed ever saying it – and claimed it was libellous as it meant that she was disrespectful and dismissive of the McCartneys and the singer to the point of being willing to disparage them publicly for promoting vegetarianism.
She sued for damages, including aggravated damages, to reflect Telegraph Media Group's refusal to apologise and its assertion that the item was not capable of being defamatory. Ms Ecclestone's counsel, Manuel Barca, argued that the piece reflected badly on Ms Ecclestone, who, the reader might conclude, was a callow and spoiled youth making dismissive remarks about her elders and betters.
Striking out the claim, Mrs Justice Sharp said that she simply did not think the item was capable of lowering Ms Ecclestone in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments