Pitt and Jolie accept payout over 'split' story
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hollywood superstars Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie accepted undisclosed damages today to settle their privacy action over claims that they were separating.
The couple were not at London's High Court to hear solicitor-advocate Keith Schilling tell Mr Justice Eady that News Group Newspapers now accepted that each of the allegations was "false and intrusive".
The actors brought an action for misuse of private information and breach of the 1998 Data Protection Act over a January front page story in the News of the World, "Pitts all over", which also appeared online.
Mr Schilling said the newspaper, whose case was that it acted in good faith, had agreed to publish an apology and pay the couple their costs and damages, which they intended to donate to the Jolie-Pitt Foundation.
Mr Schilling said the article stated that the couple had visited divorce lawyers in December 2009 to begin thrashing out a divorce deal.
It said an agreement had been concluded dividing assets of £205 million and providing for custody and visitation rights in relation to their six children, and that both of them had signed the agreement in January 2010 which made provision for their imminent separation.
He told the court the couple's Los Angeles attorneys wrote to News Group informing them the allegations were false.
But, a few days later in the next issue, the News of the World published another article, Brange Leak War, which repeated the earlier allegations and stated the couple had argued about who had leaked details of their marriage breakup to the press.
Mr Schilling said the actors, through their English solicitors, then requested the newspaper to publish an apology and retraction in respect of these allegations and, when it failed to do so, issued legal proceedings.
Afterwards, Mr Schilling said the publication had "spawned an array of false stories" all over the world.
"In consequence, when the News of the World failed to publicly retract the allegations and apologise for them - thereby leaving their readers in the dark as to the true position - the couple felt they had no alternative than to sue.
"Today's victory marks the end of the litigation brought by Brad and Angelina."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments