Andrew Keen: Why I might pen my own volume on the death of the book
New Media
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I am thinking of calling my next book "The Google Paradox". It will be a self-fulfilling prophesy about Google, authors and the book business. It will argue that the more Google does to kill the traditional publishing industry with the free online content from its search engine, the more books will get written about the central role of Google in our new digital economy.
The idea of "The Google Paradox" occurred to me while reading two new books, printed on paper by publishers, about Google. Both are written by New York City academics; both place Google at the heart of the great cultural and commercial transformation being realised by digital technology.
The first, What Would Google Do? (Collins Business, January 2009), by the City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism professor Jeff Jarvis, is a hagiography. It suggests that Google is the only company that knows how to "survive and prosper in the internet age". He argues that Google's commitment to openness and the network principle, its recognition of the collaborative and conversational nature of the new economy, and its ability to put the customer first, make it the "model" for all other companies in all other industries. It's not surprising that Jarvis, who is also an evangelical blogger, has chosen such an ecumenical-sounding title for his Google-worshipping book. He is a digital Jesuit, and What Would Google Do? has been written as a conversional manual.
The second book, Elsewhere USA: How We Got from the Company Man, Family Dinners and the Affluent Society to the Home Office, BlackBerry Moms, and Economic Anxiety (Pantheon, January 2009) is more ambiguous in its affection for Google. Written by Dalton Conley, Dean of Social Sciences at New York University, it seeks to understand why the connectivity of the new information economy is making us all so anxious and unhappy. The irony is that both books rely on Gutenberg's 500-year-old technology to explain the digital transformation of this century.
These are both printed books about the death of the printed book, and that's the synopsis for my book, "The Google Paradox". It will be out next year, if, that is, I find a publisher who'll pay me to write a 65,000-word obituary for their own business.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments