No headlong rush for a privacy law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There will be no headlong rush to introduce a new privacy law, Downing Street suggested yesterday, writes Patricia Wynn Davies, Legal Affairs Correspondent.
Laws on intimidation, intrusion and the wrongful use of confidential information exist and the impact of these, such as the recent Protection from Harassment Act, need to be tested before more regulation is contemplated.
There are strong public-interest arguments for seeking to ensure that last weekend's tragedy does not result in unjustified restrictions on freedom of expression. There are fears that the Protection from Harassment Act - the "stalking" law introduced in June - is too heavy-handed and could be used to hamper investigative journalism and legitimate protests. The first injunctions granted under the act concerned not sex pests, but animal-rights activists.
Before that, Diana, Princess of Wales, secured an injunction, under existing laws on intimidation and harassment, against a freelance photographer, Martin Stenning. The Queen also issued lawyers' letters to four photographers warning of legal action if they infringed the Royal Family's privacy during last year's summer holiday at Balmoral.
Moves towards some sort of distinct new right of privacy are inevitable, however, because of the Government's commitment to make the European Convention on Human Rights part of UK law.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments