Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

My Greatest Mistake: Peter Snow, broadcaster

'Scargill asked if I had read his speech, and, live on "Newsnight", I had to admit I hadn't'

Charlotte Cripps
Monday 14 April 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

My biggest mistake was not doing my homework properly back on Newsnight in the Eighties. Arthur Scargill had just returned from Moscow, where he had made a speech in which he gave the impression that Margaret Thatcher's rule in Britain was less humane than that of the Russian leader, Leonid Brezhnev in the USSR. We thought: good news story... get Arthur Scargill... interview him live.

Scargill agreed, and turned up at the studio that night. I was very pressed for time. All I had was a piece of copy that said that he'd attacked Thatcher and appeared to contrast her unfavourably with the Soviet leadership, so I began my questioning: "Hang on, Mr Scargill... leaders of the Soviet Union are hardly better people to run a country than Margaret Thatcher – however much you may dislike her, she is democratically elected, after all. Isn't this is a bit tough of you, Mr Scargill, to make this charge against her?"

He simply said: "Well, have you read my speech?".

Now, I hadn't read the whole of his speech. All I'd seen were the excerpts from the press agencies. But instead of saying that I'd read enough to see what he'd said, or admitting that I hadn't, I decided to try to avoid his question. I said: "Mr Scargill, with respect, I'm asking you the questions."

He said: "No, I'm asking you! Have you read my speech?"

I became more defensive, but he just kept asking me – had I read his speech? I foolishly went on dodging his question – trying to bounce it back – until I was forced, live on Newsnight, to admit that I hadn't read the speech. I was shot down in flames. Although the viewer may have sympathised with the line of questioning towards the end of the interview (when he finally answered some of my questions), by that point it was irrelevant. I had fallen on my face. It was a brilliant tactic. Scargill clearly felt confident enough to remove the ground from under me. It was a serious lesson. First, even if I couldn't get the speech, I still should have known exactly what he said. Second, I should have been prepared to cope with his tactic, but I wasn't. Scargill enjoyed it enormously. He certainly scored one there.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in