Media: News at any price
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Possibly, in an imperfect world, changing Radio 5 into a mass-market news and sports channel aimed at youngish males is a reasonably good idea, writes Maggie Brown. Sport and news are a more compatible mix than sport, youth and children's programmes.
But the suspicion with which the news has been greeted speaks volumes about the BBC's low public standing. Its misguided attempt to switch Radio 4 long wave into a rolling news service last year has created a huge wall of mistrust.
Liz Forgan, the managing director of BBC Radio, said yesterday that the public should allow broadcasters to be creative, to have a free hand in devising new services. But, on past performance, why should they be trusted? It rings hollow when Phil Harding, anexecutive who spent eight months studying how to retrieve the BBC from the rolling news mess, confirmed that research showed the project would make Radio 4 inaccessible to 1.5 million long-wave listeners - 17 per cent of its audience.
Only last December, John Birt, the director-general, was adamant that he would not back down from rolling news, despite the public outcry. Why didn't the BBC do its number-crunching first? As the nation's premier broadcaster, it can behave in a surprisingly amateur manner.
And can we be sure that the research commissioned by Mr Harding, which has led to this latest shake-up, points the way to success? The BBC has not published the findings, but we are told that only one in nine Radio 5 sports listeners are women.
The second worrying aspect is the way children's radio has been abruptly brushed aside. It is true that Radio 5 did not score large audiences. But the BBC, which manages to cross-promote everything else under the sun, never put its marketing muscle behind children's radio programmes.
At best they could have been complementary to children's television, by running in the early evening when prime-time television squeezes out kids. Radio requires different skills of concentration from television. It develops a love of language. I am amazed that the governors did not try to salvage more than a short daily morning story for toddlers (at a time when many are at nursery school or playgroups) and a Sunday classic serial.
I doubt whether the changes will be fully implemented. There are peculiar attempts to spread the pain, including an hour each weekday of schools programmes on Radio 3. Wasn't Radio 3 supposed to be the premier channel for classical music and culture? What better way of encouraging licence-payers to become even more hooked on Classic FM?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments