Jail threat for cheque book press
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Journalists who pay witnesses involved in criminal trials face jail under laws proposed by the Lord Chancellor.
The practice of "cheque-book" journalism, where witnesses are given money for their stories, will be outlawed under the reforms to be announced this Tuesday.
The proposals form the basis of a consultation paper also criticising media rewards as an incentive to witnesses.
Judges are increasingly concerned that witnesses are holding back evidence for newspapers or exaggerating details in court to command a higher price for their story.
Last week, the judge in the Damilola Taylor trial threw out the evidence of one of the prosecution's chief witnesses. Mr Justice Hooper said a £50,000 reward offered by the Daily Mail acted as an "inducement" to the girl, aged 14.
And the judge trying the teacher Amy Gehring called three schoolboys back to the witness box after claims that national papers had offered them thousands of pounds for their stories. Ms Gehring was cleared of four counts of indecent assault against boys.
Judges will have new powers to prosecute anyone who agrees to pay, or hands over money to, a witness in the run-up to or during a criminal trial.
Editors will be unable to use the defence that paying a witness money has not prejudiced a trial. However, they will be able to argue they were unaware the person they approached before a trial was to be a witness.
Until now, the media has been restricted only by a Press Complaints Commission voluntary code, which says writers should not pay witnesses involved in current criminal proceedings unless there is a public interest, and that any offer should be disclosed to the court.
Pressure to outlaw "cheque-book" journalism grew after the Rose West trial in 1995 when it emerged that prosecution witnesses had been paid by newspapers. Last year, the Lord Chancellor said he would draw up proposals for a review of the issue.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments