Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British media is giving distorted account of war, claims Blunkett

David Usborne
Thursday 03 April 2003 18:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Blunkett used a trip to New York to voice distrust of British reporters in Iraq, implying that they were giving too much coverage to the Iraqi forces and treating them as if they were "moral equivalents" of coalition troops.

The Home Secretary, who went to New York on Tuesday to discuss anti-terrorism and public security measures with Mayor Michael Bloomberg, suggested that the picture given to the British public had been, on occasions, distorted.

"For the first time ever in our history we not only have thousands – literally thousands – of journalists travelling with the troops," he told police cadets at John Jay College. "But we have broadcast media behind what I would describe as enemy lines, reporting blow-by-blow."

His comments reflected anxiety in London that some of the media coverage is undermining public support for the war. Similar views are held by some officials in Washington.

Mr Blunkett also lambasted the al-Jazeera Arab-language news channel based in Qatar, saying its reporters were "actually linked into – and ... are provided with facilities and support from – the regime".

He did so knowing he has a receptive audience: many US commentators have decried al-Jazeera for giving too much credence to the Iraqi leadership. But his timing was unfortunate. Al-Jazeera said on Wednesday it was closing its Baghdad operation after the Ministry of Information banned two of its correspondents.

Mr Blunkett also implied that some members of the media suffered from a "liberal bent" that compelled them to give equal weight to both sides. "We have it reported certainly in our own media in the United Kingdom on occasions as though they were moral equivalents," he remarked.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in