Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC to axe another 2,000 jobs

Alan Jones,Pa
Sunday 20 March 2005 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The BBC is to axe 2,050 jobs in a second wave of redundancies aimed at saving hundreds of millions of pounds a year, the corporation announced today.

The cuts will include 420 in news, 66 in sport, 150 in drama, entertainment and children's programmes, 735 in the regions, 58 in new media and 424 in factual and learning.

The cuts, announced in a special message to staff by director general Mark Thompson, follow a previous announcement of 1,730 job losses in professional services.

The BBC said a total of 3,780 jobs would be lost, a reduction of 19% in its UK workforce.

The cuts will lead to annual savings of £355 million by 2008, £35 million more than a target set last December.

Mr Thompson told BBC staff: "This is all money we plan to spend on programmes and content, both to improve the services we deliver to audiences right now and to build strong BBC services in the future.

"We want all divisions to figure out ways of achieving these savings through genuine improvements rather than crude cuts.

"We are going through the toughest period any of us can remember. It's a difficult and painful process but necessary.

"We need to free up money to start investing in our digital future, to end our current Charter in December 2006 on budget and to show we are serious about providing value for money."

The cuts will be phased in over the next three years through a combination of "modernising production, eradicating duplication and reducing administrative staff", said the corporation.

The savings meant that by the financial year 2008/9 there will be £355 million of fresh investment each year, said Mr Thompson.

Investment priorities will include £47 million by 2008 in television drama on BBC One and Two, £45 million for news, £52 million for the regions and £14 million for children's programmes.

The savings announced today will include £34 million in news, £9.9 million in sport, £22.9 million in factual and learning, £45 million in drama, entertainment and children's programmes, £7.7 million in new media and £37 million in television.

Mr Thompson said there were risks in undertaking change on such a large scale, adding there would be a lot of "hard edged activity" in the coming months.

Jeremy Dear, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists, accused Mr Thompson of "ripping the heart" out of BBC programme making.

"Throughout this whole turbulent period he has still failed to answer the single most important question – how can the BBC maintain the quality and standards it is justifiably praised for whilst axing one in five staff.

"How can hard working staff maintain quality whilst trying to do not only their own job but that of thousands of their colleagues too. The inevitable result is that staff will face burn out whilst standards and quality will be damaged.

"That will have extremely serious consequences for BBC journalism and programme making and the BBC's ability to meet its charter commitments.

"BBC staff deserve better than to be used as political pawns in what many see as an unsavoury and grubby deal between Government and senior BBC management. How can staff have confidence in those who think that what is best for the BBC is to cut 20% of its staff, reduce programme budgets and hand over parts of its infrastructure to the private sector."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in