Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Americanisms have had their fries

Jo Dillon,Deputy Political Editor
Saturday 28 December 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hey! Talking American? You've probably been watching too much television.

But now a campaign has been launched to urge the British government to regulate TV output to safeguard the English language.

Campaigners fear the influx of USprogrammes, set to increase once the Communications Bill allows foreign ownership of terrestrial TV stations, will herald the further demise of spoken English.

The Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF) wants guarantees that TV schedules will retain a significant proportion of home-spun dramas, comedies and entertainment programmes, and a list of English words and phrases to be protected.

Such a step would protect the use of the word "film" against the American "movie", "barman" would replace "bartender", "chips" would be used instead of "fries", and "autumn" instead of "fall".

American terms such as "I guess" would be supplanted with "I suppose" and food "to go" would be a "takeaway".

Granville Williams, spokesman for the CPBF, said the Government should take its cue from the French authorities, who have introduced language regulations to meet those concerns.

"The Communications Bill is essentially opening up UK broadcasting and commerical radio and television to big American firms predominantly driven by imported programmes from America."

The CPBF calls for "chap", "fellow" or "geezer" to be used instead of "guy" – a favourite of Tony Blair. And Alastair Campbell's dismissal of press reports as "garbage" would have to be modified too. It's "rubbish", if you please.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in