Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

World Cup eye test advert not offensive

Josie Clarke
Tuesday 28 September 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An advert for the supermarket Asda offering free eye tests for Uruguayans after a referee and linesman from that country missed Frank Lampard's goal for England at the World Cup has been cleared of causing offence.

The online promotion for Asda opticians stated: "Our special World Cup offer: Free eye tests for all Uruguayans. Like everyone in England, we couldn't believe our eyes when the Uruguayan referee and linesman failed to recognise Frank Lampard's equalising goal against Germany."

It continued: "We're responding by offering all Uruguayans a free eye test to avoid anything like this happening again."

One complainant, a British-Uruguayan, objected that the advert was offensive. Asda said 15 customers had taken advantage of the offer. The retailer apologised and said it had not intended to cause offence.

The Advertising Standards Authority rejected the complaint, saying: "We understood that the promotion was intended to be light-hearted and humorous, exploiting the controversy resulting from the Germany and England World Cup game.

"In that context, while we acknowledged the attempt at humour might be distasteful to some, we considered that most readers of the ad would interpret it as football banter rather than malice towards Uruguayans."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in