Marriage guidance chief quits over Diana dispute
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A row broke out last night at the marriage guidance organisation Relate after its president resigned over alleged criticisms of the Prince and Princess of Wales.
Joanna Foster has quit Relate Marriage Guidance and launched a stinging attack on Ed Straw, its chairman, and Sarah Bowler, the new chief executive. Ms Foster's resignation came after reports in the Sunday Times two weeks ago that Mr Straw and Ms Bowler had echoed disappointment at Buckingham Palace that the Princess, patron of Relate for the last seven years, had decided to leak details of her divorce negotiations.
The newspaper claimed Relate would not be inviting the Princess to functions in coming months "amid concern that the handling of her divorce is tarnishing the charity's image".
Ms Foster's resignation letter, a copy of which was sent to the Princess's staff, quoted the Sunday Times article and said comments attributed to Ms Bowler and Mr Straw "clearly implied criticism of the patron's handling of her divorce". Ms Foster, a former head of the Equal Opportunities Commission, said the comments attributed to her former colleagues showed "poor judgement, a betrayal of trust and ill-considered management of the press".
A spokeswoman for Relate said she could not comment on Ms Foster's resignation but bitterly attacked the Sunday Times. "We were very disappointed in the article ... What appears to have happened is that they wanted to be able to say that Relate had turned away from the Princess of Wales. The fact is we are very happy with the Princess as our patron.
"The quotes attributed to the two people concerned were taken out of context. One came from a press release which stressed support for couples going through divorce but made no direct reference to the Prince or Princess. The article cited insiders at Relate but the journalist involved refused to provide any corroboration and I have found no one at Relate who is anything other than happy to have the Princess as our patron for the forseeable future. The Sunday Times simply wanted to print that story come hell or high water."
The Princess's spokeswoman declined to comment, saying it was for Relate to resolve.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments