Man urges Chinese judge to reject torture-tainted evidence
A Chinese Australian writer tried in Beijing for alleged espionage says he pleaded to a judge to reject evidence of what he had said while being tortured by interrogators
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Chinese Australian writer tried in Beijing for alleged espionage said he pleaded to a judge to reject evidence of what he had said while being tortured by interrogators.
Yang Hengjun faced a closed trial last Thursday and the court deferred its verdict to a later date.
The Australian government on Friday labeled his incarceration since he arrived in China in January 2019 arbitrary detention.
The Associated Press on Monday saw the crime novelist and blogger’s account of the legal proceedings circulated among his supporters over the weekend.
Yang said he had a meeting with his trial judge three days before his one-day trial. The judge refused his request to submit evidence and call witnesses during the trial, but agreed to include almost 100 pages of defense documents in his case file.
“I made a plea to the judge to exclude my interrogation records from the court proceedings,” Yang said.
“It’s illegal. Torture They had hidden camera records,” Yang added.
Yang does not say how the judge responded to his request.
Chinese Criminal Procedure Law prohibits confessions forced by torture or threats.
The prosecution case, “according to legal facts, is groundless,” Yang said.
Yang said he was “tired and confused” during the hearing and “didn’t have the sprit to speak enough.”
He estimated he spoke for less than five minutes in his own defense, but said the hearing “gave me a sense that things are OK.”
“The interrogations I had been subjected to, where I was told I had to confess, and the treatment I received for the first one-and-a-half years was (sic) much worse,” Yang said.
Chinese authorities have not released any details of the charges against Yang, who reportedly formerly worked for China’s Ministry of State Security as an intelligence agent.
Yang told his supporters at the weekend: “I served China when I was young, even secretly.”
Yang has denied the accusation against him, and while a conviction is virtually certain, it isn’t clear when the verdict will be handed down. The espionage charge carries penalties ranging from three years in prison to the death penalty.
The trial comes at a time of deteriorating relations between the countries, brought on by Chinese retaliation against Australian legislation against foreign involvement in its domestic politics, the exclusion of telecommunications giant Huawei from its 5G phone network, and calls for an independent investigation into the origins of the coronavirus that was first detected in China in late 2019.