Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Major takes rhubarb rap for Ulster gobbledegook

Stephen Ward
Sunday 03 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If we needed official confirmation of John Major's grey language the Prime Minister today wins an award for authoring the most baffling piece of English of the year.

The Plain Language Commission has given Mr Major a Golden Rhubarb Trophy for the most confusing government document of the year, a category where as the winner might say, there is "not inconsiderable competition".

According to the commission - a commercially run gobbledegook watchdog body - the winner is the Northern Ireland settlement proposals, contained in an 11,000-word booklet entitled Frameworks for the Future.

Martin Cutts, director of the commission, is scathing in his judgement. He points out: "One sentence runs to 121 words and others exceed 70. The average is 35 words per sentence. If a topic is complex, an average of 15 to 20 would be reasonable."

In paragraph 46, picked out by the commission, the document says in no fewer than 67 words, that if there is a problem, everybody will sit down to talk about it. It summarises thus: "Where either government considers that any institution, established as part of the overall accommodation, is not properly functioning within the Agreement or that a breach of the Agreement has otherwise occurred, the Conference shall consider the matter on the basis of a shared commitment to arrive at a common position or, where that is not possible, to agree a procedure to resolve the difference between them."

Mr Major was nominated for the award by several citizens of Belfast who bought the booklet when it came out last February to try to discover where the peace process was going, and were little the wiser for reading it.

The document is not all the Prime Minister's own work, of course, but he is still entitled to the award as a signatory to the agreement, and because he wrote the foreword.

Mr Cutts concludes: "Nobody likes being negative about such a document, but Mr Major has made a public commitment to plain English in his Citizen's Charter, and this booklet fails to fulfil it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in