Major stands up for the monarchy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FORTHRIGHT defence of the enduring nature of the monarchy was delivered by John Major yesterday, amid growing expectations at Westminster that a divorce between the Prince and Princess of Wales was inevitable.
Asked after a speech at the Festival Hall, London, whether Jonathan Dimbleby's authorised biography of the Prince and the surrounding furore had tarnished the monarchy, Mr Major said: 'I think the monarchy has got its roots sunk so deep in the affection of the people of this country that it is very sound and very secure.'
But some MPs, dismayed at the latest public display of a private tragedy - and the effect on the couple's two sons - suggested that the pretence of the marriage should be abandoned.
Even Tory MPs agreed that a divorce would be less damaging to the credibility of the future king than a public relations battle waged through books and newspapers.
Downing Street made clear that the Prime Minister is ready to offer advice to the Queen if it is sought, but dismissed as 'pretty far from the mark' a report that he was poised to advise Prince Charles to divorce the Princess of Wales 'as soon as possible'. The Queen would have to give her approval.
One Cabinet minister predicted yesterday that the revelations in Mr Dimbleby's book, and the huge attendant publicity, would hasten a divorce.
But he could not see divorce being a bar to a new monarch sometime well into the 21st century, when the issue was likely to arise.
The same minister predicted that a full reading of the book would give a rounded picture of the Prince and was likely to lead to the British public warming to the heir to the throne.
Buckingham Palace denied that a rift had opened in the Royal Family when the first proof of Mr Dimbleby's book had been handed over to the Queen's private secretary, Sir Robert Fellowes, three weeks ago, and sources agreed with the minister, insisting that the biography would effectively reveal a monarch-in- waiting.
The Church of England's two most senior figures remained silent. Spokesmen for both the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr George Carey, and the Archbishop of York, Dr John Habgood, said neither would be making any comment.
What MPs think, page 3 Leading article, page 13 Andrew Marr, page 15
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments