Magazine 'filth' under attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Women's magazines have become so obsessed with sex that they should be consigned to the top shelf, the boss of a leading model agency said yesterday.
Laraine Ashton, managing director of IMG Models, said that titles such as Cosmopolitan, Company and Marie Claire had degenerated into "filth".
And she warned that she would be urging her models to think twice before consenting to pose for the magazines.
Ms Ashton said: "We don't need to read 'How to have 15 orgasms' on the front cover of these magazines. It isn't education, it's filth. They belong on the top shelf. It isn't right to say that Cosmo has been doing it for so long that it is acceptable."
The 49-year-old agency chief, who was a top model in the Sixties, preserved her most withering criticism for a new magazine, Dazed and Confused.
She told London's Evening Standard: "I object to cheapness. Dazed and Confused lives up to its name, it is rubbish and I hope it goes out of business."
Ms Ashton added: "I believe girls and boys are being exploited by magazines for the sake of ever-increasing sales.
"To have a girl and a boy in a state of undress simulating sex is gruesome, as is driving past a bus stop and seeing a couple licking ice-cream off each other. A nude scene in the shower would be okay but there has to be a line drawn somewhere."
Her outburst provoked an angry response from magazine publishing sources who dismissed it as an attempt to raise the profile of the agency.
A spokeswoman for the National Magazine Company, which publishes Cosmopolitan and Company, refused to comment.
Rankin Waddell, publisher of Dazed and Confused, defended his current issue, which depicts a topless model licking a bloody axe. "It's misrepresentation. We are not a women's fashion magazine but a style magazine such as The Face or ID. Our shots are all concept shots based around women's issues. Women shouldn't cut themselves up in order to look better."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments