Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mackay steps up court reform bid

Patricia Wynn Davies
Monday 25 November 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pressure by the United Kingdom to reform the European Court of Human Rights moved up a gear yesterday as behind-the-scenes diplomacy gave way to a well-publicised visit to Strasbourg by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, to press the Government's concerns, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.

The discussions centred on the so-called "margin of appreciation" - under which the court can recognise the right of states to order their social and domestic affairs according to national traditions - and on the appointment of judges, and the procedure of the court following the implementation of Protocol 11.

The protocol, signed by the UK in May 1994, will merge the European Commission for Human Rights, the first-tier body which draws up advisory opinions, and the European Court of Human Rights into a single permanent court.

During the round of talks the Lord Chancellor met the president of the court, the Norwegian judge Rolv Ryssdal; Daniel Tarschys, secretary-general of the court's 40-nation umbrella body, the Council of Europe; and Stefan Treschsel, the president of the commission.

The European Convention on Human Rights was drawn up in response to the gross violations during the Second World War. The UK ratified it in 1951 and later gave individuals the right to petition personally.

But Lord Mackay said: "Circumstances change and continue to change. While it remains necessary to have a system which can concentrate on substantial issues of fundamental human rights, it is just as important that the new court, without in any way diminishing the standards enshrined in the convention, continues (like the present court) to recognise the need for member states to manage their own affairs in full recognition of their national character, traditions, religious beliefs and moral standards."

Yesterday's visit follows relentless criticism by Tory MPs, particularly Euro-sceptics, of the Strasbourg court after a long line of verdicts against the UK. Lord Mackay pressed the case for greater opportunities to examine candidates' abilities and expertise in advance of the selection process.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in