Lords rebel over life sentences
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government was yesterday shaken by defeat when the Lords voted to end the secrecy surrounding the mandatory life sentence for murder.
By 142 votes to 126 the peers backed calls from Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, and Lord Ackner, a former Law Lord, for convicted murderers to be told in open court the judge's recommended minimum sentence and for them to have a formal right of appeal against it.
The Government's defeat is seen as a further indication of the influence of the senior judiciary in the Lords - they were one of the main driving forces behind opposition to the controversial changes to the criminal injuries compensation scheme, which the Home Secretary was ultimately forced to amend.
Currently those convicted of murder automatically receive a life sentence.
The trial judge and the Lord Chief Justice make recommendations in private to the Home Secretary about how long they think the murderer should actually serve, and the final sentence or "tariff" is set by him.
Both Lord Taylor and Lord Ackner insisted that their amendment to the Criminal Appeal Bill would not affect the right of the Home Secretary to set the final sentences.
It is expected that Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, will seek to reverse the defeat when the Bill returns to the Commons before the summer recess next month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments