Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lords back `no fault' divorce

Patricia Wynn Davies,Stephen Goodwin
Monday 11 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES

and STEPHEN GOODWIN

"No fault" divorce came a step nearer last night after peers gave a substantially unchanged Family Law Bill its Lords' Third Reading after rejecting an eleventh-hour bid to make couples wait longer.

The House of Commons will now be the battlefield on which critics - including ministers - will press to retain adultery and unreasonable behaviour as grounds for divorce, and to lengthen the cooling-off period from the 12 months in the Bill to 18 months or two years.

Lord Mackay, the Lord Chancellor, has provoked strong misgivings among some Government colleagues over his determination to enact the changes, and concerns within the Tory party that this could only be achieved with Labour support.

The plain fact, however, is that the Bill has emerged largely unscathed from its Lords' stages despite an onslaught of criticism by an alliance of religious and anti-divorce peers led by Lady Young, a leading Anglican and former vice-chairman of the Conservative Party. Her amendment to extend the period of "reflection and consideration" was yesterday rejected by 157 votes to 109. Last week's bid by Lady Young and her colleagues to retain fault in divorce failed by 118 votes to just 65.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in