Live-in lover loses death benefits claim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A late businessman's live-in girlfriend was not entitled to receive thousands of pounds in death benefits as a "dependent", even though she had given up her financial independence in response to his wishes, a High Court judge ruled today.
Mr Justice Carnwath said the fact that Carol Slack, of Newark, Nottinghamshire, was living with Keith Hindle-Smith and he paid for their joint expenses was not sufficient to establish that she was dependent on him, and she had given up her financial independence as "a matter of choice".
In a judgment with important implications for the beneficiaries of pension trusts, as well as the trustees, the judge ruled that the Pensions Ombudsman had been entitled to find maladministration by the trustees of the pension scheme arranged for Mr Hindle Smith, who died intestate in August 1992. The judge said the trustees had acted "wholly unreasonably" in awarding pounds 80,000 of pounds 140,000 in benefits to Mrs Slack.
In August last year, the Ombudsman ruled the award "null and void" and ordered the trustees to recover the pay-outs on behalf of Mr Hindle-Smith's children; each trustee to pay the brother and sister pounds 500 each in compensation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments