Limit on lawyers 'falls foul' of law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.STEPHEN WARD
Legal Affairs Correspondent
Martin Mears, the solicitors' leader, has been blocked by legal difficulties over his pledge to restrict numbers entering the profession - a key part of his populist election manifesto.
Last year, in the first contested election for Law Society President in 40 years, Mr Mears was voted in by the beleaguered small-firm sector of the profession, on the promise that he would restore incomes eroded over 15 years. He had accused the Law Society establishment of a defeatist attitude in failing to protect the profession.
Mr Mears confirmed yesterday that the society had received a QC's opinion that it would be acting outside its powers if it arbitrarily limited numbers.
Counsel had been asked to consider the legality of limiting the size of the profession to a notional figure equivalent to the amount of work available. He said that move was likely to fall foul of the both the Solicitors Act and the Legal Services Act. The Law Society has a dual role, as both the trade union and the statutory regulator of the profession, which means that where it acts to benefit the profession, it has to be able to argue that it is acting in the public interest.
There was undoubtedly a problem with too many students being allowed to pass their exams, Mr Mears said. There was a backlog of 26,000 people who have passed the exams and been unable to get the training contracts with firms which they need to complete qualification.
Mr Mears, who plans to seek re-election this year, has already foundered with another manifesto promise - to raise conveyancing fees which have plummeted through competition and the housing slump. The Master of the Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham, told the society that a plan to introduce minimum conveyancing fees by refusing insurance to cheap firms would probably be against the law.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments