Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Libel lawyer's no-fee offer

Ian Burrell
Tuesday 01 December 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HARD-UP DEFAMATION victims will be able to call on the services of the country's best-known libel lawyers, Peter Carter-Ruck and Partners, who are offering to take on cases on a "no win, no fee" basis.

Until now, many people have feared to challenge rich media organisations because actions are often long and costly. Mr Carter-Ruck said he had been campaigning for 30 years to make defamation actions more widely available.

Such actions have always been outside the legal aid budget but the opportunity for fighting them emerged with the introduction of the Conditional Fee Agreement Order in June.

Under the terms of such an arrangement, clients would have to pay only the firm's professional fees if they won their case, with 25 per cent of any compensation. If the case is lost, the professional fees are waived, although the losing client would still be liable for the costs of the defending side. A Law Society spokesman said the arrangement would be most useful to hard-up plaintiffs with straightforward cases.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in