Libel judge backs PR man
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Richard Branson's High Court libel case against the GTech PR director Robert Rendine was halted yesterday on the judge's directions.
After more than half a day of legal argument in the jury's absence, Mr Justice Morland ruled that Mr Rendine could not be held liable personally to the Virgin chief for any allegedly defamatory material broadcast or published on GTech's behalf. The judge entered a verdict in Mr Rendine's favour.
Mr Branson's case against GTech, which holds 22 per cent of UK lottery licence-holder Camelot, and its chief, Guy Snowden, will continue. It centres on an alleged attempt by Mr Snowden to bribe Mr Branson.
The hearing continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments