Letter: Revenge wasn't Al Fayed's
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chris Blackhurst's investigation of the role of Michael Howard in the setting up of the DTI report into House of Fraser ("The curse of Al Fayed", 18 May) broke much fresh ground but gave the impression that Mohammed Al Fayed made his disclosures about the conduct of some Tory MPs because the Home Office had turned down his application for naturalisation.
This is not so. Mr Al Fayed's revelations were first published on 20 October 1994. The Home Office rejected his citizenship application on 23 February 1995, more than four months later. If anyone was taking revenge it was the Tory government.
Mr Al Fayed's motivation was simple: despite considerable personal and commercial risk he told what he knew because he believed the voters had a right to know what some of their elected representatives get up to hiding behind the letters MP.
Michael Cole
Harrods, London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments