Letter from the editor: Honesty with our readers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We try to be honest with our readers, and part of that contract is to hold our hands up and admit when we’ve made a mistake.
David Baker thought we made one in yesterday’s edition of i, and I’ve got to say that, on reflection, I agree with him. On the news pages yesterday, we ran a picture from the funeral of the father of young Olympic diver, Tom Daley. “Why is this picture necessary?” asks Mr Baker. “We thought it was intrusive.”
It was clearly a story of public interest when Tom’s father died after a long illness: he had been a huge influence on the young man’s life and career, and this was an event that would surely be of deep significance to a national sporting hero. But what did a picture of the funeral add to our understanding? Was it intrusive? Or even prurient?
We know that Tom would have been upset by his father’s death; we don’t need to see a picture of him at the funeral service. The funeral of a national figure is a news event in its own right, but this was not that – it was that of the father of a national figure. There is an obvious difference between this event and the funeral of, for instance, Henry Cooper, from which we ran a picture recently. In our defence, it’s a very fine line to tread, but I believe that if there’s any doubt from now on we should err on the side of caution. And we’ll try not to put in a gratuitous picture of a celebrity instead!
Meanwhile, readers (well, one or two, anyway) have sprung to my defence after yesterday’s letter in which I chided myself for using the term “nerve-wracking” instead of “nerve-racking”. Kev Culkey and Nigel Lewis both point out (correctly, it seems) that either is perfectly acceptable. “It’s not as bad as ‘curling tongues’ which I have seen recently,” said Mr Lewis. I leave you with one thought: don’t make a mistake – get the new i on Saturday tomorrow!
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments