Legal curb on phone masts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GOVERNMENT PLANS to give "fast-track" planning approval for dozens of mobile phone masts have been halted by a landmark judicial review in which the Department of the Environment was forced to admit that its decision-making process had been wrong, writes Colin Blackstock.
The admission means that many of the community groups campaigning against the building of these masts will now be able to seek judicial review of other planning applications that have been dealt with through the accelerated "Prior Approval" procedure.
The decision has pleased residents in Ballymacashen, Northern Ireland, who sought the review after the mobile phone company Orange erected a mast near a residential area last September after using the fast-track approach.
Their campaign was supported by the Northern Ireland Families Against Telecommunications Transmitters (Nifatt) who want to ensure that, in the future, phone masts are not erected within 300 to 500 metres of residential properties.
Margaret Dean, founder of Nifatt, said the decision was wonderful news for the residents. "It's a huge boost for our campaign and it gives us hope for the future. If the Government and industry won't listen to us, at least the courts have now recognised that if procedures aren't followed then they will decide it's illegal.
"We're not opposed to masts or mobile phones but we are opposed to putting them so close to people's homes and schools."
Most of the groups cam-paigning against such masts object to them on the grounds of possible health risks.
The priority approval procedure, which allows masts to be erected 28 days after planning application is sought, means that many communities find mobile phone masts erected close to housing and often with little consultation between residents and the companies installing the masts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments