Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leaves on the line? Fell the trees

David Nicholson-Lord
Saturday 30 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT IS the ultimate solution to "leaves on the line" - the systematic felling of trees in a clear swath alongside railways.

Conservation groups believe Railtrack is running a national programme of tree clearance to try to rid itself once and for all of the problem that dogged its publicly-owned predecessor, British Rail, and along with that other notorious reason for train delays and cancellations - the "wrong kind of snow" - became a national joke.

Since Railtrack began operating two years ago, reports have accumulated of contractors' gangs moving in and clear-felling to create a tree-free swath 10 metres wide on both sides of the track. The latest example is at Sydenham Hill in south London, where the London Wildlife Trust has accused Railtrack of "wanton destructiveness" after contractors, called Tree Care We Care, removed trees up to 10 metres from the track in a woodland conservation area.

Other clearances have taken place in Farnborough in Hampshire, Shropshire, Brighton, Kingston and Surrey. At Farnborough, plans to fell 700 mature trees, creating a cordon sanitaire of eight metres on both sides, destroying habitat used by foxes and deer, provoked uproar.

Protesters acknowledge that some trees have to go but argue that the felling is as much about convenience and image as safety. The Urban Wildlife Partnership, a coalition of about 100 conservation groups, has called on Railtrack to consult local people and claims that the privatised company is gauging public reaction to tree-felling in advance of a new national policy to be put to the Railtrack board in July.

Railtrack says it is still observing the guidelines inherited from British Rail. However, a spokeswoman said that all the alternatives to tree-felling had been tried and found wanting.

"We have nothing against trees but some leaves form a coating on the line which is the equivalent of driving on black ice," she said. "We have to make safety a priority."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in