Leaders' TV debate `illegal'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Liberal Democrats are likely to take legal action if their leader, Paddy Ashdown, is excluded from a general election TV debate between the two main party leaders.
Lord Holme, the party's general election campaign manager, said that legal opinion indicates that the any attempt to bar Mr Ashdown would contravene the BBC's charter or the Broadcasting Act for independent companies.
Although broadcasters have been conducting lengthy negotiations with the political parties, none has so far clinched a deal to conduct a debate.
Mr Major is expected only to agree to one at the eleventh hour if his poll rating stays poor and he judges he has nothing to lose. But the Conservatives are unhappy at the prospect of Mr Ashdown taking part because they believe that he will direct most of his criticism against the Government, rather than the Opposition. That raises the possibility of a two-on-one confrontation.
Lord Holme said that the legal advice was "100 per cent clear" that the one-to-one debate could not take place. If a TV company tried to go ahead the party would have recourse to judicial review, he said. However, he added that the party would probably not be able to demand equal airtime.
The Liberal Democrats are, he said, "realistic enough to recognise that, at the margin there would have to be some tinkering". That would probably follow the formula for most TV discussions where Liberal Democrats usually get given slightly less time than the two main parties.
The Liberal Democrats argue that the same rule does not apply to the Referendum Party, funded by the millionaire tycoon, Sir James Goldsmith as the existing rights to airtime are determined by performance at the last general election.
The Liberal Democrats will next month seek to boost their profile with the electorate by producing a party political broadcast featuring comedian, John Cleese who will ask voters to send postcards pledging their support for the party.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments