Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FOR YEARS lawyers have enjoyed bamboozling the public in the courtroom with a host of arcane Latin terms but now the legal doublespeak is to be phased out under new rules published by the Lord Chancellor's Department yesterday.
The Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine of Lairg, has concluded that too many ordinary folk are confused by hearings in camera with solicitors working pro bono publico.
Instead, lawyers will be encouraged to use simple, plain English to try to improve access and understanding of the civil courts. Favourite legal stalwarts such as writ, plaintiff and in camera will instead be replaced by the somewhat less exclusive "claim form", "claimant" and "in private".
Similar fates are outlined for ex parte, Mareva and minor which will now be termed "without notice", "freezing injunction" and "child".
The changes are outlined in the 800-page Civil Procedure Rules, a pounds 250 book published yesterday, which sets out rules and protocols of the courts.
It is hoped that removing arcane terms from written procedure will eventually feed through to daily usage by lawyers, making it easier for clients to understand their cases and to give greater access to litigation for those bringing their own actions in person through the civil courts.
Last night the Lord Chancellor's Department said lawyers would be "encouraged" to use the new terms whenever possible but stopped short of issuing an outright ban.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments