Labour unhappy at ITN interview with Prime Minister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The television regulator is expected to ask ITN to justify its interview with the Prime Minister last week, following a complaint by the Labour Party. Labour complained that the seven-minute interview, which led the News At Ten bulletin on the night of the TWA 747 crash off New York, broke the legal requirement on ITN to preserve "due impartiality".
The Independent Television Commission is believed to have accepted that ITN has a case to answer, despite the assertion by Stewart Purvis, the ITN chief executive, that "there was absolutely no deal ... about where the interview would be placed in the programme". Labour officials claim the interview was "soft" and that an equivalent slot was not offered to Tony Blair. John Rentoul
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments