Labour MPs say Cook was two-faced on Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TONY BLAIR flew back to Britain from the US yesterday to face a new internal row as Labour MPs accused the Foreign Secretary of sounding more hawkish in public than he was in private discussions with them.
Crucial support for military action against Iraq came from Germany, which said yesterday that it would allow the US to use its bases for air strikes if necessary, but at home Mr Cook was under fire.
Tam Dalyell MP, who is a critic of the Gulf build-up, said that Labour backbenchers who saw Robin Cook last week just after his Commons statement on Iraq found him to be reassuringly"emollient", but his public attitude did not square with this. While Mr Cook "may well have doubts" about military action, said Mr Dalyell: "He's in a very weak position, entirely beholden to the Prime Minister ... I now feel that I just don't know this Foreign Secretary."
Mr Blair yesterday continued to heighten the rhetoric against Iraq, while trying to prepare the public for the likelihood of conflict.
In a joint radio broadcast with Bill Clinton, he pledged: "The United States and Britain are determined to prevent Saddam Hussein from threatening the world with weapons of mass destruction."
t Iraq crisis, pages 14 and 15; White House love-in, page 21; Leading article, Section 2, page 4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments